What the white paper didn’t say

Tumbleweed: the white paper is silent on the detail of how England's schools are now controlled. Pic: iStock/Getty Images
Education Uncovered has carried a string of articles, this week and last, about Monday’s schools white paper.
Of course this coverage, and much detail elsewhere, has focused on what was actually in this document.
But it seems useful to set out what was not in it, in seeking to understand that this is a policy field where a host of different scenarios are possible. The following is just a brief list.
The white paper did not:
-Transfer the control of schools’ admissions policies from academy trusts to local authorities. This had been an important suggestion in a paper published in February by Sam Freedman, who of course was Michael Gove’s adviser at the time the academies policy was introduced at scale. Freedman’s document acknowledged detailed weaknesses within the policy, while backing a move to an all-MAT structure, and the thrust of his arguments within it seems similar to that of the white paper.
To continue reading this article…
You'll need to register with EDUCATION UNCOVERED. Registration is free and gives you access to one article per month. But please consider a subscription which will give you full access to all the news articles and analysis on the website. As a subscriber you'll also be able to comment on each news article. as well as support our journalism and extend the reach of the site.

By Warwick Mansell for EDUCATION UNCOVERED
Published: 1 April 2022
Comments
Submitting a comment is only available to subscribers.