Skip to main content

Alternative provision slipping through the regulatory net: a shocking game of bureaucratic pass-the-parcel

Perhaps the most staggering aspect of our tale of the “Aspire” alternative provision service being delivered for some of the most vulnerable children across an entire council area has been the responses provided by those in charge.

Between them, the statements by the academy trust running it, the local authority commissioning and funding the service, Ofsted which is supposed to be responsible for inspecting it, and the Department for Education, overseeing its regulation, make for depressing reading.

Each seems, to at least some extent, to be passing on responsibility for the problem to another agency or agencies.

This appears to make a mockery of government claims that the academies scheme, in particular, offers simpler accountability than that previously operating via a more purely local authority system, far from perfect though the latter of course has been, too.

At the heart of the story seems to be a simple fact: the Aspire AP service for around 30 children seems to have been operating without having been registered with the Department for Education from its inception in 2014 until now. In effect, then, the services for these vulnerable children do not exist in official records.

To continue reading this article…

You'll need to register with EDUCATION UNCOVERED. Registration is free and gives you access to one article per month. But please consider a subscription which will give you full access to all the news articles and analysis on the website. As a subscriber you'll also be able to comment on each news article. as well as support our journalism and extend the reach of the site.

By Warwick Mansell for EDUCATION UNCOVERED

Published: 17 May 2018

Comments

Submitting a comment is only available to subscribers.

This site uses cookies that store non-personal information to help us improve our site.